Semantically, -ify shows the same range of meanings as -ize and the two suffixes could therefore be considered phonologically conditioned allomorphs. Translation: -ify and -ize can be considered "the same morpheme", just like a and an. The suffixes -ise/-ize -ify -ificate are all used for verbifying nouns and adjectives.
What are the differences in meaning/connotation/usage between them? (This is generalising from the sinifica... The suffix -ify (which we also use to make words in Modern English) is from French ifier. Questions: I have two closely related questions: Does the suffix -ify have any inherent characteristic of making consonants pronounced which would otherwise be silent?
ify obidegwu, What if I add it to a Modern English word (say benign or align)? Will it make the "g ... The English verb suffix -ify (which is moderately productive: you can see an overview of the tendencies for new formations at What is the difference between the suffixes -ize and -ify? and Suffixes for verbification: -ify, -icise, -ificate) comes from Latin verbs ending in -ificō, an ending derived from a reduced form of the verb faciō "make". The general guideline I would give is that /ŋɡ/ is unlikely with new formations, especially if the word is a "nonce formation" of the kind that is often hyphenated: if a spelling like "anything-ize" or "anything-ify" seems possible, then the pronunciation will likely not have /g/.
ify obidegwu, What will happen if I attach the suffixes "-ize" and "-ify" to a word ... The prefix "de-" and the suffix "-ify" are both productive in English. de- (usually added to a verb) gives the idea of removing something: deintensify; delouse, deforest, degrease, etc. Is "deabstractify" a word? [closed] - English Language & Usage Stack ...
